There must be something in the conservative disposition that prefers defense to offense. I suppose the root word “conserve” is the most obvious clue. Beloved conservative political quotes echo verbs like “preserve,” “protect,” “uphold,” “secure” and “defend,” which sound distinctly less assertive than some words leftist groups use to describe themselves, such as “occupy,” “march,” “overcome,” “action,” “advance,” “liberation," “change,” “move” and “progress.”
Defense may be a winning strategy for the team that’s ahead in the final moments of an athletic contest but it’s suicide for the team that’s behind. Let’s ask ourselves two questions: Are we winning, and is public policy like athletic competition?
I cannot answer yes. As optimistic as I am, it’s far from clear that we are winning more than we are losing. We (and by “we” I mean that happy marriage of conservatives and libertarians who agree on economic policy) have won some great victories but they haven’t yet reversed the growth of the state and the concomitant loss of liberty.
Furthermore, the sports analogy breaks down at a crucial point. There is no game clock, no bottom of the ninth, no sudden death overtime in politics. For in politics, unlike sports, victories and losses are never permanent. They can be erased by whatever happens next.
Every victory is worth celebrating but we can never say, like The Lone Ranger, “my work here is done now.” Have you ever noticed that the Left just stays on offense, no matter what, taking big wins or little ones, whether behind or ahead at the moment?
Here are three ways the Mackinac Center is staying on offense.
In football, defense can score points and even win the game. Such is not the case in the world of policy, where staying on defense merely delays the moment of defeat. At the very least, we can never give our opponents the luxury of winning without a fight.