Font size:
Gov. Jennifer Granholm and other proponents of higher taxes claim there’s no fat left to cut from Michigan’s budget to resolve a deficit of $800 million. If that’s indeed the case, taxpayers should expect that the administration won’t gamble a penny of scarce funds on yet another amusement park subsidy.
The Bay City Times first reported that the Rochester-based firm of Axiom Entertainment is eyeing 1,800 acres of state-owned land near Grayling for a $160 million theme park. A letter of intent to purchase the oak and pine woodlands along Interstate 75 reportedly has been signed by David E. Freed, who oversees land sales for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
Axiom is also reportedly seeking $25 million in infrastructure improvements from the state. The Crawford County site currently lacks sewer and water service, and would likely require improved highway access.
Amusement parks can be loads of fun, but that doesn’t justify the use of tax dollars to build one. As it is, Michigan has an abysmal record of park subsidies.
Some $35 million in local, state and federal funds was invested in Auto World, a seven-acre theme park in downtown Flint. The park, which opened in 1984, was supposed to draw 900,000 visitors annually and revive the beleaguered city. It closed after only two years.
Construction of Cereal City USA, in downtown Battle Creek, was made possible by a loan of $900,000 from the state that was secured by the city. The attraction, which opened in 1998, was billed as "a land of wonderful, interactive experiences and entertainment for the entire family, as they explore the birth, development and global impact of the cereal industry." Officials estimated that the park would draw 400,000 visitors annually, but it was shuttered in January 2007 after years of dismal attendance.
The Kalamazoo Aviation History Museum secured a $3 million state grant to launch construction of an aviation theme park. The attraction was touted as "a centerpiece for economic development and tourism in southwestern Michigan," and local officials hoped that the state would finance half of the $80 million construction cost. A 25 percent hike in the local hotel tax also was considered. Ultimately, the grant money was returned to the state after the project was scaled back for lack of support.
The city of Pontiac invested $55.7 million to build the Silverdome in 1975. The Detroit Lions relocated to Detroit’s Ford Field in 2002. Although the team paid the city $26 million for breaking its contract, Pontiac continues to incur a hefty deficit in maintaining the 127-acre site.
It’s not as if Michigan would lack recreation in the absence of park subsidies. The state already is home to several theme parks and water parks, including Michigan’s Adventure in Muskegon, which attracts hundreds of thousands of visitors annually — without corporate welfare.
Indeed, it bears noting that any park or other amusement facility that must rely on tax dollars, rather than private investment, is by definition not viable and thus unworthy of taxpayer support.
By no means is Axiom Entertainment alone in seeking economic favors from state government. The Mackinac Center’s Michael D. LaFaive has calculated that state and local governments have pledged in excess of $3 billion worth of tax incentives to some 200 firms in the past two decades under the Michigan Economic Growth Authority. A slew of other subsidies have also been granted. Nationwide, such targeted subsidies exceed $50 billion annually.
While officials justify this "investment" as necessary to job creation, the fact is that such deals rarely make good on the promised returns. The tax credits offered by MEGA in its first 10 years generated at best 13,541 jobs, or 2.3 percent of a single year’s worth of job creation in the state.
"More than just tax dollars are at stake. When government nurtures economic dependence, the spirit of free enterprise — the underpinning of American innovation and empowerment — is undermined."
In this context, the supposed benefits of yet more amusement park subsidies pale in comparison to the true costs. The Granholm administration has no business negotiating such subsidies, especially while demanding that Michigan families surrender more of their hard-earned wages to the state.
#####
Diane S. Katz is director of science, environment and technology policy and James M. Hohman is a fiscal policy research assistant for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a research and educational institute headquartered in Midland, Mich. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the authors and the Center are properly cited.
The Mackinac Center for Public Policy is a nonprofit research and educational institute that advances the principles of free markets and limited government. Through our research and education programs, we challenge government overreach and advocate for a free-market approach to public policy that frees people to realize their potential and dreams.
Please consider contributing to our work to advance a freer and more prosperous state.
