Font size:
By Jack McHugh
House Joint Resolution UU, Increase sales tax: Passed 26 to 12 in the Senate
To place before voters in a May 5, 2015 election a constitutional amendment increasing the state sales tax from 6 percent to 7 percent. This is part of a package that represents a net tax increase of $1.945 billion, of which $1.2 billion would go to road repairs and the rest to other spending. The next several bills will not go into effect unless voters approve this measure on the May 5 election.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
House Joint Resolution UU, Increase sales tax: Passed 94 to 16 in the House
The House vote on the measure described above.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
House Bill 5477, Increase Gas and Diesel Tax: Passed 23 to 15 in the Senate
To replace the 19 cents per gallon gas tax and 15 cents diesel tax with a 14.9 percent wholesale fuel tax, which at current prices is 41.7 cents per gallon for gasoline and 46.4 cents for diesel. The increases would be mostly, but not completely, offset by exempting fuel sales from the state sales tax. However, this is contingent on voters approving the large net tax increase represented by a sales tax increase on a May 5 ballot.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
House Bill 5477, Increase Gas and Diesel Tax: Passed 93 to 17 in the House
The House vote on the bill described above.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
House Bill 4630, Increase vehicle registration taxes: Passed 23 to 15 in the Senate
To increase vehicle registration taxes on trucks, electric vehicles and cars more than three years old. This would cost vehicle owners around $95 million more each year, but will not go into effect unless voters approve a sales tax increase on a May 5 ballot.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
House Bill 4630, Increase vehicle registration taxes: Passed 67 to 43 in the House
The House vote on the bill described above.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
Senate Bill 847, Increase payments to low income wage earners: Passed 23 to 15 in the Senate
To increase the state Earned Income Tax Credit, which will distribute $260 million to low income wage earners. However, this is contingent on voters approving a sales tax increase tax on a May 5 ballot.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
Senate Bill 847, Increase payments to low income wage earners: Passed 78 to 32 in the House
The House vote on the bill described above.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
Senate Bill 423, Require public school spending “adequacy” study: Passed 20 to 18 in the Senate
To require the state budget agency to contract for a study to determine how much money per student is needed for a public school to educate students sufficiently well to meet state graduation requirements. Reportedly the bill was adopted to get Democratic votes on the sales tax increase described above, but it is not contingent on that measure’s approval by voters.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
Senate Bill 423, Require public school spending “adequacy” study: Passed 72 to 38 in the House
The House vote on the bill described above.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
Senate Bill 658, Impose “Amazon tax” on internet purchases: Passed 83 to 27 in the House
To require merchants outside the state who have an affiliation with a different business located in Michigan to collect sales tax on purchases by Michigan residents, in the manner pioneered by internet retailer Amazon.com. This bill does not require voter approval of a sales tax hike like other bills in the $1.945 billion road funding/tax hike deal, but House passage was part of those negotiations. The Senate adopted the measure on Dec. 11.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
The remaining bills in this report are not related to the tax increase/road funding package described above.
House Bill 4186, Revise criminal record expungement rules: Passed 38 to 0 in the Senate
To allow a person convicted of only one felony offense and not more than two misdemeanors, to apply to have the felony “set aside,” or expunged from the person’s public record. A person convicted of not more than two misdemeanors could apply to have one or both set aside. This would not apply to convictions for criminal sexual conduct, domestic violence or crimes punishable by life imprisonment.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
Senate Bill 78, Restrict setting aside state land for “biological diversity”: Passed 59 to 50 in the House
To prohibit the Department of Natural Resources from designating an area of land specifically for the purpose of achieving “biological diversity”; to no longer require the DNR to manage forests in a manner that promotes “restoration”; and to remove from statute a legislative ”finding“ that most losses of biological diversity result from human activity.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
House Bill 4480, Require more detailed reports on corporate subsidy costs, outcomes: Passed 37 to 0 in the Senate
To require state economic development agencies to submit and post online more detailed reports on the costs and outcomes generated by their various loan, tax break and subsidy programs targeted at specific corporations, developers or industries.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
Senate Bill 789, Revise concealed pistol license procedures: Passed 84 to 26 in the House
To eliminate county concealed weapon licensing boards, and transfer the responsibility for administering and issuing concealed pistol licenses to county clerks, with the State Police still performing the background checks required by the law.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
Senate Bill 1033, Exempt “direct primary care” and “concierge medicine” to extensive insurance regulation: Passed 60 to 50 in the House
To establish that fixed-fee medical retainer agreements between a physician and a potential patient covering routine health care services are not considered “insurance” subject to the extensive regulatory regime imposed on conventional health insurance policies. This could presumably apply to “direct primary care” agreements, “concierge medicine” and similar innovations.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
Senate Bill 74, Mandate school “cyberbully” policies: Passed 65 to 45 in the House
To revise the 2011 law mandating that schools adopt anti-“bullying” policies, by requiring that their policies also address “cyberbullying.”
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
Senate Bill 269, Extend $75 million annual corporate subsidy earmark: Passed 82 to 26 in the House
To extend through 2019 an annual $75 million earmark to a “21st Century Jobs Fund” program created by the previous administration, which provides various subsidies to particular firms or industries chosen by a board of political appointees. Under current law, the earmark expires in 2015.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
Senate Bill 211, Establish firefighters’ cancer presumption: Passed 109 to 1 in the House
To establish a presumption that, for purposes of granting workers compensation benefits, certain cancers contracted by non-volunteer firefighters arose out of their employment. The burden of proof would be on the employer to show the disease was due to smoking, nonwork-causes or specific incidents. Any benefits would be contingent on the legislature appropriating money for them.
Who Voted “Yes” and Who Voted “No”
SOURCE: MichiganVotes.org, a free, non-partisan website created by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, providing concise, non-partisan, plain-English descriptions of every bill and vote in the Michigan House and Senate. Please visit https://www.michiganvotes.org.
Get insightful commentary and the most reliable research on Michigan issues sent straight to your inbox.
The Mackinac Center for Public Policy is a nonprofit research and educational institute that advances the principles of free markets and limited government. Through our research and education programs, we challenge government overreach and advocate for a free-market approach to public policy that frees people to realize their potential and dreams.
Please consider contributing to our work to advance a freer and more prosperous state.
