If we hand more responsibility for health care to government, will it deliver? It’s one thing for the state or national government to give everyone a health insurance card, and another one entirely for people to actually get access to treatment.
That’s because in their attempt to keep some semblance of financial discipline, officials take several measures, including lowballing private physicians and other providers. Recently Delaware and Walgreens got into a dispute over that state’s attempts to cut its payments for medications.
Now Mississippi is trying to squeeze more money out of its pharmacies as it struggles to keep its Medicaid program solvent.
The move has been put on hold by a judge, who says that the executive branch took action without first getting necessary legislative approval.
I have a feeling that unlike some states, Mississippi hasn’t gone to great lengths to enroll the middle class in Medicaid. But it could be forced to enroll more people — and pay part of their freight — under some health care bills being discussed in Congress. That would make treating Medicaid patients even less attractive in the state.
Cross-posted from State House Call.
Get insightful commentary and the most reliable research on Michigan issues sent straight to your inbox.
The Mackinac Center for Public Policy is a nonprofit research and educational institute that advances the principles of free markets and limited government. Through our research and education programs, we challenge government overreach and advocate for a free-market approach to public policy that frees people to realize their potential and dreams.
Please consider contributing to our work to advance a freer and more prosperous state.